Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Do you want to Come With?

I like Midwesterners.

I mean, one doesn't move to Minneapolis-St. Paul from sunny Los Angeles, only because one dreams of falling in love with a voluptuous and rugged Amazonian, Nordic woman who chops wood all day and cooks for you in her cabin while you lounge around in silk pajamas, reading the poetry of Rupert Brooke and drinking bottles of Cabernet, before spending the night with your face nestled into her ample, farm girl bosom.

No. One moves to Minnesota because one loves the people. He admires their constant cheerfulness, their glacial smiles and their hard work at breaking the icy, tundra soil and building something akin to Western civilization here. He respects their disregard for the trendy and fashionable (Mark Twain mentioned wanting to be in Cincinnati during the apocalypse because everything is 20 years behind; let's just say that one could potentially say this about the entire Midwest), their passion for putting cream of mushroom soup mix and Bisquick into nearly everything "edible," their sweet country manners, and those delightful flat accents with the elongated vowels.

So people of the Upper Midwest, consider me to be your dear friend and ally. After all, I am in the process of becoming your biographer.

But since we're friends, I need to be a little candid here. There's a couple of things you do and say that are really, really annoying to me...

I will now address one of my linguistic grievances. Let's start with an example.

Standard American English Statement: "Do you want to come with me to the movies?"

Minnesota-speak Statement: "Do you want to come with?"

This is incredibly annoying. And how difficult is it to add me to this statement? I mean, unless you've recently had a stroke, there's really no excuse for not adding an essential extra word or two or three.

It is all rude to place the demands of figuring out the context of every "come with" statement onto the recipient's shoulders.

When someone asks me that they want me to come with or they mention someone coming with, I often don't recognize the context of this statement. Which requires me to ask a follow-up question that could have been easily avoided had they been clear and precise in their initial statement.

Come with what? A ham sandwich? A handgun?

Come with whom? You? The guy down the street? The president?

This isn't Little House on the bloody Prairie. "Come with" is not charming and precious. It's annoying and stunted and stupid-sounding. And far too vague. And you folks need to work on this.

6 comments:

  1. Having family in Albert Lea and having had to deal with their lingo, I can understand your frustration...but dude, consider this -- if they had to use full sentences during those long LONG winters, their lungs would freeze from the icy air being drawn in to form the words. NOT kewl (but definitely ice cold baby).

    ReplyDelete
  2. True. I hadn't considered that possibility. Granted, the ice has all melted and I'm still hearing "come with." And it still annoys me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ugh, "come with" is a pet peeve of mine as well. I'm wondering about the geographic boundaries of its usage, though. I never said it growing up in NE Ohio, but I know people from Michigan say it, as do people from Colorado.

    But then, I grew up saying things like "the room needs cleaned" so what do I know?

    ReplyDelete
  4. "The room needs cleaned" is terrific! I'm impressed.

    And I think NE Ohio - which was part of the Western Reserve founded by native Connecticut-ers is deserves a pass from my Midwest criticisms.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ok, no *usually* I would say, "Hey, I'm going to the MOA...you want to come with?" The first part of the sentence should give you all the info you need to figure out what is being asked. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Geoff, it's not a blog unless you blog.

    ReplyDelete